Security testing is a process of identifying and rectifying security flaws present in a software application, ensuring the reliability and safety of the system against any cyber attacks, data breaches or vulnerability exploitation. It is focused on evaluating the data integrity, confidentiality, availability, and authenticity of a system, analyzing the security risks, and implementing measures to mitigate these risks.
Security testing process includes:
The purpose of security testing is to:
As a QA engineer with expertise in security testing, my primary responsibility is to identify potential security vulnerabilities by conducting thorough testing across all layers of the application. To accomplish this, I typically employ a combination of manual and automated testing techniques, as well as various tools designed specifically for security testing.
Through the use of these techniques and tools, I have successfully identified and resolved multiple critical security vulnerabilities in previous projects. For example, in my last job, I uncovered a significant vulnerability in the authentication system that allowed unauthorized users to access sensitive data. After reporting this vulnerability to the development team, we worked together to implement a fix, preventing this issue from being exploited by attackers.
There are several types of security testing that QA Engineers need to be familiar with to ensure the safety and security of the software being developed. Here are some of them:
It is important to note that each of these testing types serves a different purpose and should be used in combination to ensure the security of the system.
Yes, I have found a critical security bug in a production environment while performing a penetration testing on a client's web application. The bug allowed any user with access to the application to access sensitive information about other users without proper authorization. This was a major issue and needed to be addressed right away.
As a result of my work, the client's application was much more secure, which increased their customer's confidence and trust in the company's security measures.
Penetration testing and vulnerability scanning are two techniques used to identify security threats in a system or software program. Although they are often used interchangeably, they refer to different processes.
Vulnerability scanning is an automated process that involves scanning a system or network to identify common vulnerabilities, which could be exploited by attackers. The scanning process checks for known vulnerabilities in software and operating systems, such as missing patches or weak passwords. Typically, a report is generated that outlines the vulnerabilities detected, and recommendations are made for how to fix them. For example, in our recent vulnerability scan, we identified 10 open ports, 5 missing security patches and 2 outdated plugins in the web application, which could potentially be exploited by local attackers. We recommended updating the software to the latest version and configuring a firewall.
Penetration testing, on the other hand, aims to identify and exploit actual security weaknesses in a system using simulated attacks. It’s a manual process that involves a team of testers who mimic real-world attacks to assess how the system responds to them. The goal is to identify vulnerabilities and demonstrate how they could be exploited and the impact it could have on the system. For example, in our recent penetration testing, we were able to bypass the authentication process and gain administrative access to the system by exploiting an SQL injection vulnerability in the login page.
In summary, vulnerability scanning is a passive process that identifies known vulnerabilities in a system, while penetration testing actively exploits vulnerabilities to assess the risk they pose to a system. While vulnerability scanning is generally automated, penetration testing is usually done manually by a team of testers.
Sources:
A Man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack is a type of cyber attack where an attacker intercepts communication between two parties, such as a client and a server.
During a MITM attack, the attacker will position themselves between the two parties and can view, modify, or even inject new data into the communication.
For example, let's say a client is trying to log into their online bank account. The client's computer sends a request to the bank's server to log in. During a MITM attack, the attacker would intercept this request and pretend to be the bank's server, sending a fake login page to the client.
The client would then enter their login credentials, believing they are logging into their bank account. But the attacker would receive this information and use it to log in to the client's real bank account.
This is a dangerous attack because the attacker can gain access to sensitive information, such as login credentials, credit card numbers, and personal information. It can be prevented by using encryption, such as SSL, to protect communication between two parties.
Yes, I have experience in creating a threat model for one of the applications I was responsible for testing. I approached it by first identifying the assets that needed to be protected and their respective security requirements. Then, I brainstormed potential threats and vulnerabilities that could impact those assets and ranked them according to likelihood and impact.
Using this approach, I was able to create a comprehensive threat model that outlined potential risks and solutions to mitigate them. As a result, we were able to proactively address security concerns and prevent any security incidents from occurring.
Authentication and authorization are two important concepts in security testing. Authentication refers to the process of verifying the identity of a user or a system, while authorization refers to the process of determining what actions a user or a system is allowed to perform. In simpler terms, authentication is about confirming who you are, while authorization is about determining what you can do. A good example of how these concepts work together can be seen in a banking application. When a user logs into their bank account, they need to provide authentication credentials, such as a username and password. Once they are authenticated, the system will then determine what actions they are authorized to perform. For example, they may be authorized to view their account balance, transfer funds between accounts, or pay bills. One way to measure the effectiveness of these security testing concepts is through the use of penetration testing. A penetration test is a simulated cyber attack on a system to identify vulnerabilities and potential weaknesses. By conducting a thorough penetration test, an organization can identify areas where authentication and authorization may be lacking and make the necessary changes to improve their security posture. In conclusion, authentication and authorization are two important concepts in security testing that work together to ensure the security of a system. By understanding the difference between the two and implementing strong measures for both, organizations can better protect their systems from cyber attacks.
Answer:
As a result of these security testing activities, I have been able to identify and fix several vulnerabilities in APIs in my previous roles as a QA engineer. For instance, I discovered a critical XSS vulnerability in one of the APIs used by a banking client, which could have allowed an attacker to steal customers’ banking details. I immediately notified the concerned parties, and the vulnerability was fixed within hours, thereby preventing any potential financial loss and damage to the bank’s reputation.
When approaching testing for injection vulnerabilities, my first step would be to identify all user inputs that have the potential to be exploited through injection. This includes inputs such as form fields, URLs, and cookies.
Through this approach, I have been able to identify and remediate several injection vulnerabilities in applications I have tested. For example, while testing a financial web application, I identified an SQL injection vulnerability in the login form. This vulnerability allowed an attacker to bypass authentication and access sensitive user data. After working with the development team to patch the vulnerability, I re-tested and confirmed that the application was now secure.
In conclusion, we have covered 10 essential security testing interview questions for QA Engineers, along with their answers. These questions will help you prepare for your next interview and give you an edge over other candidates. As you move forward with your job search, it's important to write a great cover letter. Check out our guide on how to write a great cover letter to showcase your skills and experience. Another important step in your job search is to prepare an impressive quality assurance testing CV. Learn how to do that with our guide on how to prepare an impressive quality assurance testing resume. Finally, if you're looking for a new job opportunity, don't forget to check out our remote Quality Assurance Testing job board. With the increasing demand for remote work, we have a variety of job openings that could fit your skill set and experience.