When conducting a usability test, my process involves the following steps:
By following this process, I have been able to consistently gather valuable insights into user behavior and preferences that have directly led to improved product design and user experience. For example, in a recent test conducted for a mobile app, we were able to identify a confusing navigation structure that was leading to high rates of user drop-offs. Using the data collected from the test, we were able to implement a simplified navigation structure that resulted in a 20% increase in user retention.
There are several techniques that I have used to recruit participants for usability testing:
Overall, I have found that using a combination of these techniques has been most effective for recruiting participants for usability testing. By leveraging various channels, we are able to ensure diverse participant representation, which leads to more accurate and beneficial test results.
When choosing tasks and scenarios for a usability test, I take several factors into consideration. First and foremost, I aim to identify the most critical user goals or actions that the product is designed to facilitate. These goals may be informed by user research such as surveys or interviews, or by analyzing task completion rates, user feedback, and other data from analytics tools.
I also take into account any known pain points or issues with the product that have been reported by users, as well as areas of the product that have undergone recent changes. For example, if a new feature has been added to a product, I may want to focus on testing the usability of the interface for this feature.
Finally, I pilot test the tasks and scenarios with a small group of users to ensure that they are clear and relevant, and to identify any issues with the task flow or wording. Based on the results of the pilot test, I iterate on the tasks and scenarios as needed prior to launching the full usability test.
When analyzing and prioritizing usability issues found during testing, I follow a three-step process:
Organize issues into categories:
Quantify the impact:
Next, I analyze the impact of each usability issue. To do this, I ask myself the following questions:
Based on the answers to these questions, I assign a severity level to each issue.
Prioritize based on impact:
Finally, I prioritize each usability issue based on its severity level. To do this, I use a priority matrix that takes into account both the severity level and the frequency of the issue. For example, a critical usability issue that affects 50% of users would be assigned a higher priority than a major usability issue that only affects 10% of users.
For example, in a recent usability test I conducted on an e-commerce website, I identified three critical usability issues: users were unable to complete a purchase because of a broken checkout link, users were unable to view product images, and users were not able to log in to their account. By quantifying the impact of each usability issue, I found that the checkout link issue affected 60% of users, the product image issue affected 30% of users, and the login issue affected 10% of users. Using my priority matrix, I assigned the highest priority to the checkout link issue, followed by the product image issue and then the login issue.
During a usability test for a mobile app, we found that users were confused about how to complete a certain task. The task involved navigating between different screens to find a specific piece of information.
We tried a few different solutions, such as adding more prominent navigation buttons and reorganizing the information hierarchy, but none of them seemed to make a significant improvement. We were getting frustrated and concerned that the usability issue may not be resolvable within the timeline and budget allotted.
After discussing the issue with the development team, we decided to try a new approach. We created a simple animation that visually demonstrated the steps needed to complete the task. We included the animation in the onboarding process for new users and made it easily accessible for existing users.
We conducted another round of usability testing after implementing the animation and saw a significant improvement in task completion rates. Users’ confusion decreased from 70% to 15%. They were delighted with the helpfulness of the feature, and we received positive feedback in addition to the data.
Qualitative data plays a critical role in my usability testing process. While quantitative data is useful for measuring metrics such as task completion rate or time on task, qualitative data provides insights on why users behave a certain way.
Qualitative data can be subjective, but it provides important context to the numbers and metrics that quantitative data delivers. By combining both types of data, we can gain a complete picture of the user experience and make informed decisions on how to improve it.
As a UX researcher, I am deeply committed to making sure that our usability testing sessions are accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. To achieve this, I adhere to several best practices:
This approach has proven to be effective in practice. In a recent study I conducted, we recruited four participants with disabilities and received valuable insights on how to improve the accessibility and usability of our product. We also found that accommodating for the unique needs of these individuals not only benefits them, but also improves the usability of our product for all users.
During a recent usability test for a new mobile app, we had planned to have participants complete a series of tasks on their own while we observed their behavior. However, we quickly realized that the users were struggling with a certain feature of the app and were becoming frustrated.
To prevent the participants from becoming too frustrated and potentially abandoning the test altogether, I adjusted our approach on the fly. I decided to pause the test and have a discussion with the participants about their experience and what was giving them trouble.
The data collected during this usability test showed that this adjustment was successful. Before the adjustment, participants were struggling to complete the task, with an average completion time of 2 minutes and 45 seconds. After the adjustment, participants were able to complete the task in an average of only 1 minute and 10 seconds. Additionally, participants reported feeling less frustrated and more confident in their ability to use the app.
This experience taught me the importance of being flexible during usability tests and adjusting our approach on the fly when necessary. This can help improve the overall quality of the data collected and provide a better user experience for the participants.
As a UX Researcher, ensuring unbiased usability testing is crucial in obtaining accurate data and results. One of the ways I ensure this is by developing test scenarios that are neutral and do not favor any particular design or feature. Additionally, I recruit participants who are representative of the target user population, and not biased towards a particular demographic or behavior.
Data collected from one of my recent usability tests showed a significant improvement in task completion times for a website’s new checkout process design, as compared to the previous design. The test was conducted using a double-blind method with a randomized order of tasks and questions, and a neutral test scenario. The results were therefore more objective and unbiased, providing valuable insights for the design team to implement the new checkout process.
In summary, by developing neutral test scenarios, recruiting diverse participants, using randomized task orders, double-blind testing, and a standardized approach, I ensure unbiased usability tests, yielding accurate and actionable results.
When it comes to ensuring that stakeholders understand and act upon usability testing findings, I take a few key steps:
In a recent project where I utilized these techniques, we conducted usability testing on a mobile app for a client. Our findings showed that users were struggling to complete a specific task within the app due to unintuitive design. To ensure stakeholders understood the severity of the issue, we presented them with qualitative feedback from users as well as quantitative data showing a significant drop-off in task completion rate. We then worked with the stakeholder to redesign the task flow and tested it again, resulting in a 30% increase in task completion rate.
Based on the aforementioned usability testing interview questions, UX Researchers can prepare well for their upcoming job interviews. It's also important to remember that interviewers often want to see a candidate's enthusiasm and creativity when answering these questions. If you’re preparing to apply for UX Researcher positions, don't forget to write a great cover letter. You can find a guide to writing an effective cover letter here. Additionally, preparing an impressive CV can be a game-changer. Follow our guide to crafting a stand-out resume here. If you're in the market for a new UX Research job, check out our job board here. We offer a variety of remote positions to fit your needs.
Discover 70,000+ Remote Jobs!
Join now to unlock all job opportunities.
We use powerful scraping tech to scan the internet for thousands of remote jobs daily. It operates 24/7 and costs us to operate, so we charge for access to keep the site running.
Of course! You can cancel your subscription at any time with no hidden fees or penalties. Once canceled, you’ll still have access until the end of your current billing period.
Other job boards only have jobs from companies pay to post. This means that you miss out on jobs from companies that don't want to pay. On the other hand, Remote Rocketship scrapes the internets for jobs and doesn't accept payments from companies. This means we have thousands of more jobs!
New jobs are constantly being posted. We check each company website every day to ensure we have the most up-to-date job listings.
Yes! We’re always looking to expand our listings and appreciate any suggestions from our community. Just send an email to Lior@remoterocketship.com. I read every request.
Remote Rocketship is a solo project by me, Lior Neu-ner. I built this website for my wife when she was looking for a job! She was having a hard time finding remote jobs, so I decided to build her a tool that would search the internet for her.